Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • French "3 strikes" law suffers shocking defeat
  • Dangerous Ruling Puts Interactive Web Services at Risk
  • MPAA Negotiates With ISPs to Disconnect or Penalize Copyright Offenders
  • House Considers Limiting Patriot Act Spy Powers
  • Court: your MySpace page isn't private
  • EFF Stating their Case Against DRM to the FTC
  • FBI: Criminals Auto-dialing With Hacked VoIP Systems

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

IT and A National Security Letter Gag Order

Submitted by MacRonin on March 23, 2007 - 12:31pm
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation
  • Government
  • Law Enforcement
  • Laws
  • Privacy
  • Rights
  • Surveillance
  • Tracking
  • USA Patriot Act

IT and A National Security Letter Gag Order: "fstyke writes 'An article in the Washington Post (anonymous for obvious reasons) describes the trauma the president of a small US IT company faces after receiving a National Security Letter. This is sent by the FBI demanding information (140000+ have been sent between 2003/2005 according to the article). Makes for an interesting read of the side effects of receiving such a letter and its requirements for the recipient to remain silent about even the fact he/she has received it.'The letter ordered me to provide sensitive information about one of my clients. There was no indication that a judge had reviewed or approved the letter, and it turned out that none had. The letter came with a gag provision that prohibited me from telling anyone, including my client, that the FBI was seeking this information. Based on the context of the demand -- a context that the FBI still won't let me discuss publicly -- I suspected that the FBI was abusing its power and that the letter sought information to which the FBI was not entitled.''

(Via Slashdot: Your Rights Online.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • FBI Hoaxes Boost Online Fraud
  • NetFlix Cancels Recommendation Contest After Privacy Lawsuit
  • Advertising - Instant Ads Set the Pace on the Web
  • Best Practices for Government Datasets: Wrap-Up
  • TJX Hacking Conspirator Gets 4 Years
  • The Beginning of the End of Data Retention
  • Wanted: Trust Detector
  • Wikibooks Cryptography Textbook
  • Feds: TSA Worker Tried to Sabotage Terror Database
  • Hi-tech governments growing keener on snooping, says report
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.