Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Beyond Security Theater
  • Online Age Verification for Children Brings Privacy Worries
  • PBS's Frontline Covers NSA Spying
  • Deep-Packet Inspection in U.S. Scrutinized Following Iran Surveillance
  • P3P and the Future of PETs
  • Classmates.com’s Facebook Mimicking Prompts Privacy Suit
  • Student slaps Google Buzz with privacy lawsuit

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Cryptographer Warns that Math Errors in Computer Chips Could Be a Global Security Risk

Submitted by MacRonin on November 21, 2007 - 11:23am
  • Activists
  • Alert
  • Cryptography
  • Editorial
  • Exploits
  • Hardware
  • Hmmm
  • NSA - National Security Agency
  • Privacy
  • Remember
  • Security

Cryptographer Warns that Math Errors in Computer Chips Could Be a Global Security Risk:
Noted Israeli cryptographer Adi Shamir (the 'S' in RSA Security and the middle one in the picture at right) has made an obvious, but nonetheless important, observation about the security problems that would ensue should a math error be found in any widely used computer chip.

Such an error could allow intelligence agencies and industrial spies to crack messages protected by public key cryptography. It could also allow hackers to break the protections in software used for e-commerce.

The New York Times's John Markoff says Shamir made the observation in a research note he sent to cryptographer colleagues recently.

Shamir's observation isn't new. A division error found in Intel's Pentium microprocessor in the mid-90s first raised the specter of serious computational problems caused by buggy chips -- though that particular problem wasn't considered widespread and Intel claimed that it would affect spreadsheet users only once every 27,000 years. But given the greater reliance on cryptography these days in regular business correspondence and e-commerce transactions, the kind of bug Shamir describes -- which is only hypothetical at this point -- would be far more serious.

Shamir's note is all the more remarkable, a cryptographer says in Markoff's story, because it suggests that Shamir's own RSA algorithm could be vulnerable.

Mr. Shamir wrote that if an intelligence organization discovered a math error in a widely used chip, then security software on a PC with that chip could be ‘trivially broken with a single chosen message.’

Executing the attack would require only knowledge of the math flaw and the ability to send a ‘poisoned’ encrypted message to a protected computer, he wrote. It would then be possible to compute the value of the secret key used by the targeted system.

With this approach, ‘millions of PC’s can be attacked simultaneously, without having to manipulate the operating environment of each one of them individually,’ Mr. Shamir wrote.

The research note is significant, cryptographers said, in part because of Mr. Shamir’s role in designing the RSA public key algorithm, software that is widely used to protect e-commerce transactions from hackers.

‘The remarkable thing about this note is that Adi Shamir is saying that RSA is potentially vulnerable,’ said Jean-Jacques Quisquater, a professor and cryptographic researcher at the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium.

Shamir notes that laws governing trade secrets prevent users of such chips from being able to verify that the chips were made correctly.

‘Even if we assume that Intel had learned its lesson and meticulously verified the correctness of its multipliers,’ Shamir wrote in his note, according to the Times, ‘there are many smaller manufacturers of microprocessors who may be less careful with their design.’

(Read Original Article - Via Threat Level.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.