Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • Three Ways to Fight Immunity
  • Who's been reading my cell-phone records?
  • RealDVD Case: Home Copying Hangs in the Balance
  • Symantec: Criminals Pool Resources To Beef Up Online Attacks (TechWeb)
  • Google Puts Your Data in a Corner
  • Telecom Immunity bill dying, thanks to you -- KEEP IT UP!
  • Administrivia: Switching to new server. (This is the new one)

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

In Internet First, RIAA File Sharing Hearing to Be Webcast

Submitted by MacRonin on January 18, 2009 - 3:36pm
  • Alert
  • Companies
  • Copyright
  • Court (US)
  • DMCA
  • Editorial
  • Entertainment
  • Hmmm
  • Legal
  • News Follow-up Update/Correction
  • P2P
  • Podcast
  • RIAA

In Internet First, RIAA File Sharing Hearing to Be Webcast - Via Threat Level:

The internet will get a chance to watch live as lawyers spar in a Recording Industry Association of America file sharing lawsuit this month, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner of Massachusetts granted over-the-internet coverage for a Jan. 22 motions hearing in the RIAA's lawsuit against Boston University student Joel Tenenbaum and others. The defendants are seeking to dismiss allegations they shared copyrighted music over peer-to-peer networks.

The RIAA opposed the broadcast, requested by the defendant's attorney, Charles Nesson, a Harvard University legal scholar. On Wednesday, the judge called the RIAA's position "curious."

"At previous hearings and status conferences, the Plaintiffs have represented that they initiated these lawsuits not because they believe they will identify every person illegally downloading copyrighted material. Rather, they believe that the lawsuits will deter the Defendants and the wider public from engaging in illegal file-sharing activities. Their strategy effectively relies on the publicity resulting from this litigation," she ruled.

The ruling is groundbreaking. Federal trial courts rarely, if ever, permit still pictures or live feeds from their courtrooms, though appeals courts are more open. Most states allow some type of photography, and vest the decision
exclusively with the judge presiding over the case.

Many state judges began barring cameras in court following the O.J. Simpson murder
trial. But Judge Gertner is an outspoken proponent of cameras in the courtroom, and she noted that the law does not prohibit them.

"Nothing in the local rules of the District Court of Massachusetts, the policies of the Judicial Council for the First Circuit, life, or logic suggests that this motion should be denied," she
ruled(.pdf).

In September 2007, Gertner
testifiedon Capitol Hill that "public proceedings in the 21st century necessarily mean televised proceedings." She said "the vast majority of the American public get information about courts through screens — television or the internet."

The internet feed will be provided by
Courtroom View Networkand will be funneled to the
Berkman Center for Internet and Societyat Harvard Law School, which will broadcast the hearing live. Trial in the case is scheduled for March 30. Cameras have only been granted for the 2 p.m. Eastern, Jan. 22 hearing.

Last month, the RIAA announced it was abandoning its file sharing legal campaign, which has targeted more than
30,000 individualsbut would continue with cases already in the pipeline. Most cases settled out of court for a few thousand dollars. Only one has gone to trial, which resulted in a
mistrial.

Illustration:
Modernhumorist

See Also:

  • Top Internet Providers Cool to RIAA 3-Strikes Plan
  • Former Teen Cheerleader Defies RIAA Over $7400 File Sharing Tab ...
  • Analysis: RIAA Strategy Shift Mired in Murky Legal Waters
  • Imagine RIAA, MPAA in Control of Handbag Industry
  • Top Internet Providers Cool to RIAA 3-Strikes Plan


(Read Original Article - Via Threat Level.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • FBI Hoaxes Boost Online Fraud
  • NetFlix Cancels Recommendation Contest After Privacy Lawsuit
  • Advertising - Instant Ads Set the Pace on the Web
  • Best Practices for Government Datasets: Wrap-Up
  • TJX Hacking Conspirator Gets 4 Years
  • The Beginning of the End of Data Retention
  • Wanted: Trust Detector
  • Wikibooks Cryptography Textbook
  • Feds: TSA Worker Tried to Sabotage Terror Database
  • Hi-tech governments growing keener on snooping, says report
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.