Privacy Digest

News that can impact your privacy.
Login/Register
What is OpenID?
  • Log in using OpenID
  • Cancel OpenID login
  • Create new account
  • Request new password
Home Blogs MacRonin's blog
    • FAQ
    • Wishlists
    • Contact
    • Categories/RSS

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Privacy Digest 
Bookmark This Page 

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertisements

Tracking System
Tracking System
Private Detectives
Quality Security Services in California
Fleet Management
Hosting

Popular content

Last viewed:

  • The distorting effect of grants of anonymity by journalists
  • Time Warner Cable Exposes 65,000 Customer Routers to Remote Hacks
  • All Your Apps Are Belong to Apple: The iPhone Developer Program License Agreement
  • A Push to Rewrite Wiretap Law - washingtonpost.com
  • The 2007 International Privacy Ranking
  • SANS outlines the top cyber security risks
  • Why IP addresses are no longer enough to identify internet users

tags in Topics

Activists Alert Anonymity Companies Congress Copyright Court (US) Databases Data Mining Editorial EFF Entertainment Exploits Fourth Amendment Government Hmmm ID Infrastructure Law Enforcement Laws Politics Privacy Remember Reports Rights Security Spin Zone Surveillance Telecommunications Tracking
more tags

View blog authority
Congressional Research
Broadcast Flag

Indefinite Detention: No Guilty Verdict Required

Submitted by MacRonin on July 14, 2009 - 5:45pm
  • ACLU
  • Activists
  • American Civil Liberties Union
  • Congress
  • Court (US)
  • DoD - Department of Defense
  • DOJ - Dept of Justice
  • Editorial
  • Government
  • Hmmm
  • Legal
  • Person Career
  • Remember
  • Rights
  • Spin Zone

Indefinite Detention: No Guilty Verdict Required: Via Blog of Rights: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union.

In her testimony before the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee last week, Denny LeBoeuf, director of the ACLU’s John Adams Project, highlighted a number of the most egregious flaws in the military commissions system. LeBoeuf cited, among other things:

  • the use of evidence obtained through coercion (in clear violation of the due process clause of the Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and U.S. Military Law);
  • the admission of hearsay evidence (inconsistent with international practice in numerous courts, including the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia, and the International Criminal Court);
  • the denial of the right to choose one’s own defense counsel (a right emphasized by the Supreme Court and granted even to defendants at Nuremberg.)

This testimony, and the evidence which supports it, offer an irrefutable condemnation of the Obama administration’s decision to revive the military commissions.

Yet even if the military commissions do go forward (as Defense Department General Counsel Jeh Johnson advocated in his own Congressional testimony last Tuesday), they are marred by an additional glaring flaw: Even if the Commissions do exonerate a defendant of all charges, the Obama administration has claimed the right to continue to imprison the defendant indefinitely. So even if a detainee’s case survives the use of coerced evidence, the admission of statements from a shadowy, unnamed source, and the lack of a properly selected defense attorney — even if the defendant is able to overcome these hurdles and demonstrate his innocence — the administration can continue to detain him, on the unsubstantiated grounds that he might "endanger the American people."

Indeed, as President Obama announced in a speech on May 21, these detainees could be grouped with "all manner of dangerous and violent criminals" in federal supermax prisons.

This notion that individuals can be indefinitely detained, on the vague and unsubstantiated basis that they might pose a threat, renders the administration’s proposed changes to the military commissions completely useless. Although Johnson claimed in his testimony that the improved commissions would provide a "fully legitimate forum," such "legitimacy" is pure window dressing so long as the President can detain whomever he wants to, regardless of the commissions’ outcome.

The Obama administration’s mistaken belief that it can legally detain individuals, even if they have been exonerated — albeit by critically flawed commissions — is completely contrary to President Obama’s asserted desire to break with the abuses of the Bush administration. If the president truly wants to disavow the mistakes of the past eight years, he must begin by trying these detainees in federal court, and respect the outcomes of those trials.

Read Original Article:(Via Blog of Rights: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union.)

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Twitter Twitter
  • Digg Digg
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Technorati
  • del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Facebook Facebook
  • Furl Furl
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Yahoo Yahoo
  • MacRonin's blog
  • Add new comment

Recent blog posts

  • In Bid to Sway Sales, Cameras Track Shoppers
  • Unprecedented 25-Year Sentence Sought for TJX Hacker
  • EFF Appeals Dismissal of Warrantless Wiretapping Case
  • Viacom Makes Its Case Against Yesterday's YouTube
  • Obama supports Senators draft plan to rework U.S. immigration policy - Includes National Biometric ID card for all.
  • Domain Names Can't Defend Themselves
  • Hacker Disables More Than 100 Cars Remotely
  • Judges Approves $9.5 Million Facebook ‘Beacon’ Accord
  • Hooking Up The Big Brother Machine... And Fighting It
  • Court: State Can Dump Non-Sex Offenders Into Registry
more

Performancing Metrics

Compilation © Copyright 1997-2010 Paul Hardwick, with Web Hosting provided by MacRonin.com.